Dec 13, 2007

Paths of Glory

Paths of Glory (directed by Stanley Kubrick) is about one of the biggest scams in world history (World War I). Kubrick proved to be an agitator after its release with it being banned, criticized, and condemned globally. It was an anti-war film in a time when pacifism was not a national virtue. The cold war was on and war seemed eminent at any second. With the films quality and controversy, Paths of Glory was Kubrick’s first “masterpiece.”

Paths of Glory was important because its intention was to make aware the cattle the soldiers played during the war. The generals only concern was making a career for themselves no matter what human cost. To these generals, a soldiers life was a mere statistic. The generals seemed to be in a form of psychosis and completely free of any sort of human empathy.

Of Kubrick’s war films, Paths of Glory is most effective in its intentions. Spartacus was just a way to make some cash. Dr. Strangelove came out as a nihilists satire. Full Metal Jacket was nothing new. Paths of Glory was a bold defiance against the right timing. It was also the film where Kubrick started to develop his style and obsession to detail. Although Kubrick’s The Killing showed a promising director, Paths of Glory confirmed a new talent and master craftsman.

The battle scenes throughout Paths of Glory felt like the most realist to that doubt. Bodies piling upon bodies and eardrum blooding explosions echoed the feeling of old 16m bolex stock footage. Paths of Glory just made it feel more clear. Kubrick was successfully able to articulate what he felt was a true battle scene.

Kubrick seems to be more of a realist than the stereotypical liberal idealist. He has claimed that Paths of Glory isn’t an anti-war film and that he isn’t a pacifist. Paths of Glory was merely the displaying of the irrationality and career obsessed mentality of opportunist generals. The film has nothing to do with why the war being fought is bad or for what reason the war is even being fought for.

Paths of Glory is concluded appropriately with the singing of a captured German girl. She is able to communicate with the French soldiers on a universal emotional level, through song. This songs gives a sign of hope for humanity, although this wasn’t successful with the second world war. Kubrick just seemed to be showing that irrational history has a way of repeating itself. Paths of Glory stands among Kubrick’s greatest films. Many of Kubrick’s films could be considered excessive in length. Paths of Glory is quite short at less than ninety minutes. Kubrick was able to say a whole lot more when having to cram his film into a smaller budget.

I found Paths of Glory to be the most interesting and true American anti-war film. Films like Platoon and Apocalypse Now make war still seem exciting and even mythical. Paths of Glory presented human error at its least empathetic mode. The circumstances are presented and they are absurd. Most anti-war films are unable to show the absurdity of war. Kubrick succeeded.

-Ty E


Anonymous said...

Haven't seen this one for awhile, but what a great film. As for Kubrick, that new box set of his better be under my tree this Christmas. It better.

Anonymous said...

I saw this for the first time after reading this review and this is probably my favorite Kubrick movie. Its short, to the point and has a point to begin with. Can't say that for any of his other films.

jervaise brooke hamster said...

5th on the all time list after "come and see", "cross of iron", "all quiet on the western front", and mike nichols astonishing and ludicrously under-rated 1970 masterwork "catch 22".